ahhh.. I didn't look at it from a vulnerability aspect, makes sense. I guess psync exposes files renamed or moved to potential data loss.
Now I'm a bit more nervous about the suggested work around (erase then copy). This potentialy leaves the entire drive vulnerable for data loss.
I guess this is a no-win situation. I suppose it's best to have a backup drive larger than the orignal for maximum safety and in that case it's good to know SuperDuper will keep the data as safe as possible during the copy operation.
|