#1
|
|||
|
|||
Super-Duper vs Tri-Backup
Corlin here:
Super-Duper vs Tri-Backup Well I just bought Super, as it seems the easiest way to get my family to backup there Mac's. I have been using "Tri-Backup" for a few years now, and it has served me well. Yet the rest of my family refuse to use it which means that I become the tech support person on a few non-backed up drives....very scary. My question is I am used to doing a "Evolutive" backup using Tri-Backup. which keeps a copy on the destination drive of every revision of all files, not removing a file to replace it with the newest version. What is the "Super-Duper" equivalent? Now I also keep a bootable partition on an external hard drive in case of a visit by Murphy. Super dose this very well and simple enough for my family to get in the habit of doing so also. Good work thanks |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Backup | jkenneym | General | 15 | 10-17-2004 06:30 PM |
Security of SuperDuper Backup Data? | Zeigh | General | 1 | 08-08-2004 12:29 PM |
1st backup clone to ext dr estimated time ?? | esuebrown | General | 3 | 07-24-2004 04:31 PM |
Problems making an image backup | MacTech | General | 1 | 07-02-2004 04:08 PM |
Problem running Backup - all files script? Here's a solution! | dnanian | General | 0 | 01-12-2004 04:32 PM |