 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-23-2008, 03:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Time Machine and Superduper coexistence...
So I want to set up Superduper to be scheduled to do automated "smart updates" to it's backup on a regular basis.. but I do *not* want it and Timemachine trying to backup at the same time and slow each other down.
Any ideas to tell TM to turn off at the beginning of a backup and turn back on at the end? 
|
|
#3
08-23-2008, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
What about an undocumented way? ;-)
|
|
#5
08-23-2008, 11:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perfect. That's more than acceptable given the current situations.
Hopefully Apple will publish an Applescript dictionary to support something like this in a more "official" capacity. Thanks again.
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup | toy | General | 1 | 07-26-2008 12:02 PM |
| New user: Which one first -- SuperDuper or Time Machine | david.paige | General | 3 | 02-24-2008 03:38 AM |
| Time Machine stopped working - SuperDuper involved? | adriansmith | General | 18 | 02-20-2008 03:48 PM |
| SuperDuper and Leopard if not using Time Machine | edesignuk | General | 3 | 02-03-2008 06:41 AM |
| Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
Linear Mode
