Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2009, 09:10 PM
nucleotide nucleotide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4
How Does SD Work With Virtualization?

Hi, new to mac. I'm planning to hook an external HD (Samsung F3) onto an iMac (SnowLeopard) and trying to decide on my backup options. Thinking of installing Parallels 5, and have read on here that SD does indeed backup Parallels.

What I don't quite get is if Parallels contains Windows files (presumably NTFS), how is SD (which runs on HFS+) able to save Parallels? Does Parallels somehow convert Windows files to FAT32 ?

Also, I understand there are problems with Time Machine treating virtual machines as one large file. How does SD handle saving virtualization folders differently?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2009, 09:12 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,933
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Most standard installations create a 'disk image' hosted on your HFS+ volume. Inside that image is a virtual Windows disk, and that's what's backed up.

Parallels/VMWare/etc should not be running when you back up.

TM is a problem because these images tend to be very large, and backing them up each time would result in a lot of disk space being used. Since SD! doesn't keep multiple versions, it's not a problem.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2009, 10:39 PM
nucleotide nucleotide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
Most standard installations create a 'disk image' hosted on your HFS+ volume. Inside that image is a virtual Windows disk, and that's what's backed up.

Parallels/VMWare/etc should not be running when you back up.

TM is a problem because these images tend to be very large, and backing them up each time would result in a lot of disk space being used. Since SD! doesn't keep multiple versions, it's not a problem.
Thanks. So the disk 'image' does not affect the file system itself then?
And SD still backs up the entire image, it just doesn't keep each new version and simply overwrites the previous version?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2009, 07:59 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,933
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
I don't know what you mean by "the disk 'image' does not affect the file system itself then"...

And, yes - SD! backs up the segments of the image that have changed (if it's a sparse bundle-like image), or the entire image file (if it's one big file).
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2009, 02:40 PM
nucleotide nucleotide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
I don't know what you mean by "the disk 'image' does not affect the file system itself then"...
I asked how SD manages to save the virutalization folder if SD is on a different file format/system (e.g. HFS+) than the virtual Windows disk (presumably NTFS ?). I thought this would be incompatible...?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2009, 02:45 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,933
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
You're not saving a 'virtualization folder'... you're saving the disk image file along with the other files on your HFS+ volume.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2009, 07:26 PM
nucleotide nucleotide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
You're not saving a 'virtualization folder'... you're saving the disk image file along with the other files on your HFS+ volume.
Ok. What file system/format does the disk image use?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2009, 09:28 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,933
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
I have no idea: it's whatever Parallels or VMWare, etc, use.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-15-2010, 09:22 PM
Dewdman42 Dewdman42 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 62
I am just pondering the best way to approach backing up my mac, which has a frequently used Parallels XP instance on it. Trying to figure out the best way to avoid copying a bunch of stuff redundantly. Sounds like its pretty much a no brainer that Parallels should be stopped when SuperDuper runs. Unfortunately, the disk image size of parallels can often still be quite a bit larger then neccessary as well unless you run the Parallels compress command ahead of time, etc.

I'm kind of thinking the right approach is to keep as much of my critical windows data OUTSIDE of the VM where it will get backed up by SuperDuper nightly. Then have SD ignore the parallels image and just keep one copy of that image file somewhere else in case I need to restore it. Of course as I change the windows config, it has to be backed up too. Dunno...

It adds 50% or more to the size of my SD backup if I leave the parallels image included in the SD backup too, and I have to remember to shut down parallels before I got to bed.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-15-2010, 09:48 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,933
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Well... I'd still remember to shut down Parallels and take the size hit. It's much easier to restore that way.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-16-2010, 05:07 PM
hassiman hassiman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 17
VM backup

Just do a normal SD backup and as stated make sure your VM is shut down before backing it up. You will BU all your files including the data that is contained in your Windows VM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrade Drive - Would this work? pseudoyams General 5 01-14-2009 12:23 PM
Safe to work off of external drive's backup? blackant General 3 06-29-2008 08:34 PM
Keyboard doesn't work after using superduper bustardvan General 5 06-24-2007 04:33 PM
[info] AppleScript to Work Around SD & Intel 10.4.8 Issues Mr. CoBalt General 2 01-04-2007 04:07 PM
will SuperDuper work for my requirements? jchou General 1 03-05-2005 04:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.