![]() |
|||||||||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just read this section and learned the "work around," which if I understand correctly is to run a single Erase and Copy, then switch back to Smart Update. This logic seems counterproductive to me.
Just a suggestion for the developers, I think it would make more sense to have Super Duper analyze both the source and the backup, and determine before copying any files what data needs to be erased in order to have a seamless process. The way the procedure is currently set up, if I backup at night, while I'm away from the computer in questions, and I get one of these errors, I'm unprotected for the next day of work until I can fix the problem. Just my 2¢ from a paying customer. |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Smart Update: copy modified files? | billzz | General | 1 | 10-12-2007 05:55 PM |
| Smart update user files to pre-existing bootable volume = disaster! | Sondergaard | General | 6 | 04-24-2007 05:09 PM |
| Smart Update copying files that haven't been changed? | salparadi | General | 3 | 11-05-2006 11:40 AM |
| Smart Update Question | gbjerry | General | 1 | 06-24-2006 07:43 AM |
| Smart update copying all files each time | fabius | General | 15 | 05-29-2005 09:29 PM |