![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Catalina, SuperDuper and Time Machine side by side
Hi Nathan,
I just read your blog post about the challenges of making SD work with Catalina. In the post you describe that the target will need to be converted to APFS. Does that mean TM and SD backups will no longer be able to co-exist on a single volume? Right now I have one physical disk that has a single filevault encrypted HFS+ partition that holds both TM and SD backups. It sounds like there's going to be some challenges. I haven't updated to Catalina yet and planning to wait for your final release before doing so. Can you please address the issue of having TM and SD backups on the same volume? It sounds like this is going not be possible with Catalina. Will SD watch out for this type of situation? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
You can't store Time Machine backups on HFS+ volumes, and HFS+ volumes can't store APFS Catalina backups. It's not our choice...
We won't convert an HFS+ volume with Time Machine backups on it to APFS, so we do watch out for it.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time Machine Issue with Restored Clone | sdsl | General | 3 | 10-14-2012 08:18 PM |
Time Machine Copy | jerrykrinock | General | 1 | 04-02-2010 01:36 PM |
Needed: Time Machine and SuperDuper guidance | kapalama | General | 7 | 08-13-2009 07:55 AM |
Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup | toy | General | 1 | 07-26-2008 12:02 PM |
Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |