#1
|
|||
|
|||
When is a Clone not a clone?
I had a minor problem the other day, so I booted from my firewire clone, which I have set to erase and copy three times a week. I noticed that it is not a copy of my HD. For one thing, I had 38 apps which needed updating, as per Versiontracker, whereas I only had 3 on my HD. I also had a couple of programs which I had "turned off" on my HD, which were very much alive on the clone. If Superduper is supposed to wipe the clone and copy over everything on my HD, why is it not identical?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cloning a safety clone | camner | General | 6 | 10-29-2009 04:52 PM |
Windows equivalent to SuperDuper!? | jreffner | General | 21 | 08-13-2009 05:36 PM |
Using Disk Utility from Clone gets -9972 error (falsely?) | eagseags | General | 6 | 09-08-2007 09:50 PM |
How important is the volume name of the clone? | sdsl | General | 1 | 09-03-2007 10:05 AM |
Problem getting apps to run on clone volume | ChetA | General | 3 | 09-06-2005 02:19 PM |