![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Feedback? RAID 0 + Nightly SuperDuper Clone
I'm in the process of reconfiguring my hard drives + backup configuration and wanted to see if I could get any feedback on a particular configuration that I *believe* is promising.
First of all, I have a PowerMac G5 and 4 500GB SATA drives. 2 Drives internal and 2 Drives external housed in Icy Dock enclosures and connected via a Firmtek PCIe SATA adapter. My initial test of a RAID 0 on the external disks indicated a roughly 33% increase in speed reading and writing. I knew RAID 0 was fast but this is really fast! With that said, I'm painfully aware that RAID 0 can be a dangerous configuration to run as either drive failing kills the RAID. But honestly I'm not willing to take the performance hit that would come with a RAID 1 and it seems to me that losing a non-raided drive, be it the boot drive or data drive is why we are all using apps like SuperDrive in the first place--reliable backups are the only proof against drive failure. I know several sysadmins that don't even trust RAID 5 for that matter. The configuration I'm asking for feedback on is pretty simple... Internal: 2 Drives RAID 0 External: 2 Drives RAID 0 Nightly SuperDuper Clone of internal to external. Throw in 2 more drives and I'll do monthly offsite rotations too. What do you think? Is this wise or not? Any comments or other ideas are welcome. Thanks! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Windows equivalent to SuperDuper!? | jreffner | General | 21 | 08-13-2009 05:36 PM |
Does SuperDuper really clone the complete harddisk with partion for Mac & Windows? | llords | General | 8 | 11-01-2007 11:44 PM |
Can SuperDuper make a Bookatble Clone? | iLLuMiNaTiCa | General | 3 | 06-09-2007 06:57 AM |
SuperDuper! and RAID 1 | UWS | General | 2 | 10-27-2006 11:57 AM |
Bug in SuperDuper clone? | zack | General | 3 | 01-24-2005 12:28 PM |