 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
02-10-2011, 11:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
They're not directly bootable and are more 'indirect' - that is, if something happens to part of the image, you tend to lose the whole thing. Whereas with a backup that's written directly to a disk, if one file is damaged the rest are usually OK.
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windows equivalent to SuperDuper!? | jreffner | General | 21 | 08-13-2009 06:36 PM |
| Migrating from one hard drive to another | zestyping | General | 3 | 07-25-2008 09:22 AM |
| Best process to replace internal hard drive using SuperDuper!? | emikysa | General | 26 | 02-09-2007 06:03 PM |
| Long Hang While Copying | BackerUpper | General | 4 | 06-12-2006 09:26 AM |
| Strategy for backing up two internal drives to one external drive? | fredhoysted | General | 5 | 03-21-2005 10:00 AM |
Threaded Mode