 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
11-04-2008, 10:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not sure I understand -- preserve 'its own content'? We will always preserve a folder named "Backups.backupdb", regardless of whether Time Machine is actively backing up on that drive, assuming you're using "Smart Update" and there's no folder on the source named "Backups.backupdb".
The "What's going to happen?" section of the UI will tell you what'll happen...
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windows equivalent to SuperDuper!? | jreffner | General | 21 | 08-13-2009 05:36 PM |
| Cloning from a backup and Time Machine Weirdness | isaac | General | 3 | 03-27-2008 01:09 PM |
| Clone Time Machine from local FW drive to NAS drive | gianfri | General | 4 | 03-16-2008 11:45 PM |
| Restoring boot drive from a clone and subsequent Time Machine backup | Hoosier_1701 | General | 1 | 03-06-2008 01:42 PM |
| A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
Threaded Mode