#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks SJK.
At the prices for a UPS rated long enough to let unaccompanied backup jobs complete, times the number of Macs to protect, plus the aesthetics challenges, it becomes a question of risk. I would certainly not be putting a UPS on every Mac if it was just OSX recovering its file system. That's why I'd really like to understand if the damage risks are higher during backup jobs than with just OSX doing its normal file system recovery. If I stand a real risk to lose both source and backup disks during a SuperDuper backup job in a form that would not be OSX recoverable then the UPS becomes mandatory ... hopefully a more informed smart decision :-) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hard drive size doubled after backup.... | sanketr | General | 7 | 08-02-2008 12:16 PM |
Server drive won't mount after backup | rhennosy | General | 1 | 11-09-2007 03:49 PM |
Backup failure on a certain file | bmat | General | 3 | 09-25-2007 09:06 AM |
How to verify a Scheduled Backup? | tuqqer | General | 3 | 12-06-2005 06:50 PM |
(Zero-length) File caused SuperDuper to abort backup | alancfrancis | General | 7 | 08-31-2005 10:42 AM |