 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
11-03-2007, 10:17 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No, Leopard did not come "unexpected". But, even with that known date, we didn't get the final bits until last Friday. Do you think it would be a good idea for us to release a version of SuperDuper! that wasn't throughly tested with that release version of Leopard, which is significantly different than the last developer seed?
That's just not something we're willing to do. I'm sorry if you're annoyed, but you'd be a lot more annoyed if we released something that wasn't as reliable and tested as what you're using now.
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Restoring my Super Duper Backup - Tiger or Leopard ? | pauljulian | General | 1 | 11-02-2007 10:31 AM |
| Cloning a Leopard installation | Gomff | General | 3 | 10-29-2007 09:43 AM |
| Apple appropriates term "Sandbox" in Leopard | macWish | General | 2 | 10-22-2007 09:27 AM |
| Leopard Time Machine vs. SuperDuper | MMM | General | 5 | 07-05-2007 05:20 PM |
| Setup Leopard & Tiger to use same home folder | lonewolf2222 | General | 5 | 09-02-2006 09:56 AM |
Threaded Mode