 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
06-26-2009, 01:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sure iSCSI may be slow if you are comparing it to USB and/or Firewire however it's 10 times faster than SMB/CIFS. As I understand it, SD will perform incremental backups, yes? So really only the first backup will the be most difficult. Furthermore, I could do the first backup locally on the LAN, and then transport the file server to the geographically disparate location and then just do incrementals from there. Does that make sense?
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SD and TM backups - what goes first? | Moses3d | General | 14 | 02-19-2008 01:53 PM |
| Saving backups? Necessary for scheduled backps? | gcoghill | General | 2 | 12-09-2007 11:43 PM |
| Scheduled Backups Don't Run | Drdul | General | 3 | 08-07-2007 06:45 AM |
| Scheduling Rotating backups | Tangobozo | General | 1 | 09-18-2006 06:49 AM |
| Feature request: "Run scheduled backups NOW" option | ChicagoLarry | General | 1 | 09-11-2006 12:29 PM |
Threaded Mode