 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
12-29-2009, 05:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi, Nick.
1. See http://www.shirt-pocket.com/forums/s...ead.php?t=3566 2. Hardware mirroring shouldn't present any problem, it's transparent to the application. 3. Transparent protection against hardware failure is always valuable. I RAID mirror (or use higher RAID modes with distributed parity and thus recoverability, e.g. Drobo) everything, always, without exception (well, save for things like laptops, which can't). 4. I assume Time Machine could handle that, but don't know for sure. Of course, you could have Time Machine remove older backups... it's not really intended as an infinite archive.
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Needed: Time Machine and SuperDuper guidance | kapalama | General | 7 | 08-13-2009 07:55 AM |
| Restore from Super Duper and Time machine? | noahd1 | General | 1 | 03-23-2009 08:02 AM |
| Time Machine and Super Duper on the same drive | iisokman | General | 5 | 10-27-2008 11:45 AM |
| Super Duper Backup and Time Machine on Same Drive | rozanski | General | 2 | 04-13-2008 02:20 AM |
| A SuperDuper Back Up Strategy | Bagelturf | General | 3 | 09-09-2007 01:23 PM |
Threaded Mode