|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What if the disk image is just one of many files on a drive and you are Smart Updating the whole drive? (In this case the disk image would not be mounted.)
David |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Then the bands of the bundle that have changed would be copied. In the case of a sparse image, the whole thing (if changed).
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In the case, then, where one wants to keep synced two external drives which contain sparse images, the most efficient procedure without a custom script would seem to be, first, to mount the sparse images on both drives, then perform a copy between them; finally, perform a copy between the drives, which will skip the sparse images and copy the other modified files on the source drive. But there is probably something wrong with this procedure, yes?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. The dates of the band files will be different, regardless of the state of their contents, and so will be copied again.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiple errors of kind: "Caught I/O exception(5): Input/output error" | amagjo | General | 7 | 04-14-2009 10:01 PM |
Cannot Read SuperDuper! Image from Tiger in Leopard | ecornips | General | 2 | 12-11-2007 09:50 PM |
Smart Update to Sparse Image takes up far more space than source | harvardslacker | General | 3 | 06-09-2007 01:08 PM |
Undersized disk image and a Boot Camp-related backup question | garybollocks | General | 3 | 10-23-2006 01:07 PM |
SuperDuper Backup of AES 128 Encrypted Disk Image | rwg4 | General | 3 | 11-30-2005 10:28 AM |