 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-19-2008, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
10.5.5 Breaks Time Machine
10.5.5 update seems to have done something that breaks Time Machine backups for a number of people (me included).
I haven't tested Super Duper yet (it's currently my GOOD backup  ) and I don't want to risk losing it.There are a decent number of threads on Apple's Support forums: http://discussions.apple.com/forum.j...D=1227&start=0 For me, the the logs complain about the fsevents and then the backupd process does a segmentation fault... Never had a problem in the past... Dave, what are the chances that problems introduced into the backupd, fsevent process will affect SD? Might it affect Smart Updates and not "erase and copy" backups? mac-10 
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using SuperDuper for an offsite Time Machine backup | toy | General | 1 | 07-26-2008 12:02 PM |
| Cloning from a backup and Time Machine Weirdness | isaac | General | 3 | 03-27-2008 01:09 PM |
| Time Machine to an existing SD backup volume? | scutchen | General | 1 | 02-22-2008 02:26 PM |
| Time Machine Behavior | nkhester | General | 0 | 02-15-2008 03:53 PM |
| A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
Hybrid Mode
