|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
yeah i figured it wasn't the app's fault; unless different copy methods were slower/faster than others. i was also curious if differnet copy methods used different amount of resources; whether a "smart copy" would use more RAM/CPU than a simple copy over new or different files.
i'm also curious where someone would start to diagnose it, whether it'd be at the network level, the array level, etc. -patrick |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Well, certainly Copy Newer would do a bit less stat-ing, but that stuff would likely be pretty cached. I don't think you'll see much of a difference...
Diagnosing will likely be quite difficult: you'd have to look pretty carefully about the pattern of I/O on the far side of the link, and I'm not sure you'd be able to make it much better without a lot of control of both sides.
__________________
--Dave Nanian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
thanks for the replies man, keep up the fantastic work!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advice on other backup packages | jrls | General | 5 | 03-09-2007 05:46 AM |
Advice on 2-stage backup to offsite storage. | cheese2 | General | 3 | 06-17-2006 01:57 PM |
How to verify a Scheduled Backup? | tuqqer | General | 3 | 12-06-2005 06:50 PM |
(Zero-length) File caused SuperDuper to abort backup | alancfrancis | General | 7 | 08-31-2005 10:42 AM |
Smart Backup Error | bill s | General | 20 | 02-04-2005 09:46 AM |