#1
|
|||
|
|||
Any advantage to using Erase.. vs Smart..?
I am assuming that after doing several incremental updates to my system and third-party software that the files needed for each application tend to get scattered around my hard drive.
I assume that doing multiple Smart Updates with SuperDuper! probably also fragments files that might better be kept together - yes? no? Does SuperDuper! do any organization or optimization of files when making a clone? Would making a clone using <Erase, Then Copy> have any advantage over <Smart Update> in preventing file fragmentation? -gw |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Smart Update running like full erase and copy | drindiana | General | 7 | 02-19-2008 01:53 PM |
Spotlight Privacy tab refuses to recognize SuperDuper Smart Update -- 100% repeatable | RFMoya | General | 4 | 09-22-2007 01:46 PM |
Erase, then Copy: Disk Image Size Planning | gbeb | General | 1 | 07-05-2007 12:15 PM |
scheduled Smart Updates are not happening | chris7777 | General | 3 | 12-17-2005 11:26 AM |
Smart Update Deletes Rest of Volume? | Pixx | General | 12 | 04-26-2005 10:04 AM |