Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2007, 12:19 AM
SteveL SteveL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 28
Speed Comparisons?

Hi,

Has anyone done testing to compare the length of time that it takes to SMART UPDATE onto various targets, e.g., FireWire 400 vs. 800 vs. USB?

Does the speed of the FireWire disk and type of FireWire make any difference?

What is the limiting bottleneck in a SMART UPDATE? The speed of the source disk? processor speed? or target disk?

Thanks,
-steve.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2007, 12:22 AM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,923
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
The limiting bottleneck is the speed of the I/O system. But I don't think you're likely to see a huge difference between a FW400 and FW800 drive...
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2007, 05:43 PM
SteveL SteveL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 28
Hey thanks Dave. My personal experience is so varied that I'm at a loss to offer much of an opinion.

Other's real observations would be welcomed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:36 PM
klmorin klmorin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 28
Exact. But, in fact, we must consider two things: analysis of the data and the transfer of the data.

It is clear that the analysis does not depend at all on the type of connection (at least for the source). But, it's different for the transfer of data.

On my system, a smartupdate backup takes about one minute for one Gb, with either connection (FireWire or USB), if no data were added or modified. On the other hand, if data must be transferred, the process is two or three times faster in FireWire. But many factors may influence the performance.

Last edited by klmorin; 03-18-2007 at 09:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:20 PM
sdsl sdsl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 73
For what it's worth, I have done smart backups with firewire 400 and 800 for a 50-GB data set. The smart backup update takes about 9 minutes over firewire 400 and about 6 minutes over firewire 800. For the original full backup with erase of target drive, the two backups were about 90 minutes and 70 minutes -- but there may be other factors since the firewire 800 is done with a Maxtor 500 GB drive which is a faster drive than the Firelite Smartdisk used for the firewire 400 backups. Overall, I believe the firewire 800 is faster but in practice, unless one is backing up a few very large files, I doubt much of a difference would be observed.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2007, 05:46 AM
matt! matt! is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6
Backing up my 160GB internal drive to my new external drive I am getting roughly twice the throughput using Firewire 800 (WD MyBook Pro, >8MB/s) compared to my old USB2 external drive (WD MyBook Essential, ~4MB/s).

I am using an aging PowerMac 1.8 G5.

matt
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FireWire 800 copy speed leejoramo General 5 03-03-2008 06:36 PM
Very slow Speed pasha General 9 02-01-2007 11:26 PM
Expectations on copy speed AnalyticsUSA General 7 12-01-2006 05:25 PM
SD! & HDD copy speed fun DaleMeyn General 3 03-20-2006 04:24 PM
New netTunes (v2.0) on the way: significant speed improvements! dnanian General 0 05-23-2003 11:27 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.