 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
11-16-2007, 10:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with 'ksrhee' here, Larry (although Time Machine does prompt to turn on when turned off when you attach new drives) -- Time Machine does what it does pretty well, and is a nice complement to SuperDuper!, and vice versa.
It really isn't a matter of one or the other. They do different things well -- I encourage you to use both, if you have the disk space.
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| backup file size—SD vs. Time Machine | jotaro | General | 10 | 06-23-2009 10:00 AM |
| Will Time Machine make SuperDuper obsolete? | JAC II | General | 9 | 11-07-2007 03:54 PM |
| Cloning a Time Machine Volume | barrysharp | General | 5 | 10-30-2007 11:58 PM |
| A different angle on SD & Time Machine integration | badlydrawnboy | General | 10 | 10-26-2007 08:37 PM |
| How will SuperDuper! integrate with Time Machine? | Felix | General | 15 | 10-23-2007 03:55 PM |
Threaded Mode