 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
09-02-2009, 02:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
FWIW a Chronosync bootable copy results in the identical increased size as Superduper!
Unless Chronosync is also prebinding (which I haven't heard) the cause is perhaps something in the OS. I did a CCC copy too, but it was block level, so unsurprisingly it was identical to source. 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windows equivalent to SuperDuper!? | jreffner | General | 21 | 08-13-2009 05:36 PM |
| SD clone fails when the source is a .dmg on a read-only network share? | Robo | General | 5 | 08-09-2009 11:19 AM |
| Differing drive sizes (source vs. clone) | bccreative | General | 1 | 05-10-2008 10:36 PM |
| SuperDuper Clone To Larger Formated Drive | Whippy | General | 1 | 04-18-2008 10:26 AM |
| Server 10.4 - Clone to larger drive | boff | General | 1 | 09-26-2005 01:50 PM |
Threaded Mode