 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
06-20-2009, 08:15 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, although in general I'd suggest backing up your entire source volume, not just two selected bits of it. (Note that by "incremental" I assume you mean what Smart Update does, which is only copy and delete what it needs to to make the destination once again reflect the state of the selections from the source.)
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SuperDuper prevents MacBook Pro from sleeping | scotty321 | General | 2 | 06-14-2008 07:40 PM |
| New to Mac and to SuperDuper - Need a little help | MikeG | General | 15 | 02-14-2008 10:35 PM |
| A word of praise for SuperDuper! | MMM | General | 3 | 06-21-2006 10:08 PM |
| After 10.4.4 SuperDuper Stopped Recognizing Target Drive | bobcarr@mac.com | General | 1 | 01-12-2006 03:01 AM |
| SuperDuper Backup of AES 128 Encrypted Disk Image | rwg4 | General | 3 | 11-30-2005 10:28 AM |
Threaded Mode