 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
09-23-2006, 03:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It would, as long as you're able to keep it conveniently up to date and you're writing directly to the drive. But, of course, additional redundancy (physical) is always good, so I'd encourage both. Again, though, your choice -- I'm only offering recommendations.
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A word of praise for SuperDuper! | MMM | General | 3 | 06-21-2006 10:08 PM |
| After 10.4.4 SuperDuper Stopped Recognizing Target Drive | bobcarr@mac.com | General | 1 | 01-12-2006 03:01 AM |
| SuperDuper Backup of AES 128 Encrypted Disk Image | rwg4 | General | 3 | 11-30-2005 10:28 AM |
| Minor concerns regarding SuperDuper | giba | General | 1 | 05-02-2005 05:06 PM |
| Another review: MaMUGs looks at SuperDuper! | dnanian | General | 0 | 01-26-2004 09:26 AM |
Threaded Mode